Sonuç :

Rechercher çıkıntı araştırma

En son konular
Çarş. Tem. 06, 2016 10:29 am tarafından korasoglu

» 14-mart-2015
C.tesi Mart 14, 2015 8:32 am tarafından BORAN38

Ptsi Eyl. 29, 2014 5:08 am tarafından kılıç3838

» sümbül...
Salı Eyl. 02, 2014 12:36 pm tarafından Battal Ebrail

» taşın üçgen şeklinde delinmesi bir define işareti midir?
Çarş. Ara. 18, 2013 8:05 am tarafından 56476364528

» deneme
C.tesi Kas. 23, 2013 7:54 pm tarafından CANTAR

» buldugumuz bir taş
Ptsi Eyl. 09, 2013 3:54 am tarafından cansu

» Eski rum evleri ve definesi
Ptsi Eyl. 09, 2013 3:46 am tarafından cansu

» kaya işaretler
Cuma Eyl. 06, 2013 10:30 am tarafından kurt ini

» taştan daire ve dörtgen
C.tesi Haz. 29, 2013 12:38 am tarafından yousef

Kimler hatta?
Toplam 9 kullanıcı online :: 0 Kayıtlı, 0 Gizli ve 9 Misafir


Sitede bugüne kadar en çok 114 kişi Cuma Nis. 24, 2015 10:17 am tarihinde online oldu.
RSS akısı


Bağlı değilsiniz. Bağlanın ya da kayıt olun


Önceki başlık Sonraki başlık Aşağa gitmek  Mesaj [1 sayfadaki 1 sayfası]

1 China Bir Salı Ekim 05, 2010 1:35 am




In China, The first evidence of advanced farming and surplus food production appears related to the Yangshao culture, which was focused in the basin formed by the confluence of the Yellow River (Huang Ho), the Fen Ho, and the Kuei-Shui Rivers.
This Yangshao culture, which relates to the Xia Dynasty, is characterized by handsome painted pottery. This culture also includes cultivated millet, rice, kaoliang, and possibly soybeans, as well as domesticated pig, cattle, sheep, dog, chicken, and possibly the horse and silkworm. There was also “ceremonial” pottery vessels and elaborately worked objects in jade, flint, bone, and stone. This culture dates to about 3,500 B.C.
Note: There are several Pyramids in China, some quite large. However, because of the political situation, western archeologists have not been able to investigate them. Whatever information Chinese archeologists have uncovered, has not been made available.

Specifics of the ancient East African migrations which led to Modern Man's presence in China and colonization of the entire world, can be found here: Though as one would expect, when it comes to European and Anatolian (Turkey) settlement, it is not only inaccurate, it is downright Racist. But what would you expect?

Some may be interested in the official Chinese Government take on the Xia Dynasty. (This is taken from the Chinese government website).

This part relates to government at the beginnings of village living and agriculture:
To facilitate the needs of survival and development, a fair, upright and capable person was chosen to lead the people in their work and to organize their defenses against invasions. This became a process whereby Yao, for example, recommended Shun, Shun recommended Yu and Yu recommended Gaotao, and so on. Later generations named this method of selecting a tribal head The "Abdication System". This period, where egalitarianism was widespread, was characterized by peace, equality and the common ownership of wealth, historians referred to it as the Society of Great Harmony.
As population increased, some people inevitably broke away from their groups to form new clans. With improved productivity, an individual was able to produce more than he could consume. This meant that neighboring clan captives were kept alive as slaves instead of being killed. The slaves were then obliged to work, and their total output became the property of their owners. In this way, private ownership evolved. As more and more people became either owners or slaves, a class structure developed within the society, thereby replacing the former primitive Society of Great Harmony.
The Longshan Culture is a prime example of this period. To protect their own interests, the privileged classes abandoned the Abdication System and adopted a new political system and social regulations. After the death of Yu the Great, his son, Qi, killed the appointed successor and usurped power. In so doing, he established a new era of hereditary monarchy that subsequently ruled in China for nearly 4,000 years. This was when the Xia (21st-17th century B.C.), the first hereditary dynasty in China was born.
As the first slave dynasty in Chinese history, the Xia Dynasty began with the reign of Qi, the son of the Great Yu, and ended with the fall of Jie. With its capital located in Anyi (north of Xia County in mid-west Shanxi Province), the Xia was ruled by the descents of the Xiahou tribe. Altogether, there were 16 kings in 13 generations. {The Shang is referred to as the second slave dynasty}.
In their chronology, the Yangshao is indeed the original culture, but they attribute the Xia to the Longshan. Interestingly, no mention is made of different ethnicity's, and no evidence is offered to prove that the Xia enslaved the Mongols.
When visiting the Chinese governments Website, one would note that the Chinese still imply that they descent from Peking Man (Homo-Erectus), of course this is racist nonsense. A genetic study done by researchers from all over the world: China, Japan, U.S.A. U.K. and other countries, and published in 2001; definitively answered the question of Chinese origins. The findings were that the original Chinese were 100% pure Black African, with absolutely no outside admixture - But here again, we are talking about the original Black Chinese, modern Chinese are quite different.
Click here for link to the Chinese governments history website

The Yangshao culture is followed by the Lungshan, after which comes the Yin, or Shang, which dates to about 1,500 B.C, and is by far the better known.

A note here: We have already made clear that dates should not be taken literally. A point of comparison: the Yangshao culture is dated conventionally at 3,500 B.C, yet just across the bay in Japan, the same type people (the ancient Jomon), who migrated "from" China to Japan, are known to have inhabited that area since about 35,000 B.C, so be careful what conclusions you draw from dates.

For many years, the Xia Dynasty was thought to be a mythical time that the Chinese tell about as part of their oral history. Though the Xia Dynasty existed in oral histories, there was no archaeological evidence found of it until 1959. Then excavations at Erlitou, in the city of Yanshi, uncovered what was most likely a capital of the Xia Dynasty. This site showed that these people, were direct ancestors of the Lungshan/Longshan culture. Radiocarbon dates from this site, indicate that it existed from 2100 to 1800 B.C. Despite this new archaeological evidence of the Xia, they are still not universally accepted as a true dynasty.

The Shang, rather than the Xia, are still considered by most, to be the first true dynasty of China. Like the Xia, the Shang were originally considered to be a myth. They were discovered because Chinese pharmacists were unknowingly selling oracle bones that the Shang had created; the pharmacists were selling the bones as dragon bones. These bones were first noticed in 1899, and by the 1920's, they were traced back to Anyang provence, where the last Shang capital was found and excavated. Excavations were halted in 1937, when Japan attacked China. In the 1950's, an even earlier Shang capital was found near present day Zhengzhou. Traditional Chinese history indicates that the Shang Dynasty consisted of 30 kings and seven different capitals.

Shang Chariot and horse burials

Chariot horse burials are found from Greece to China, but they are relatively rare except in China and the bones are often very poorly preserved. The earliest chariots and chariot burials in China date to the Shang dynasty, at around 1250 BC (Linduff 2003). Their use in the Shang period mainly seems restricted to royalty. But during the succeeding periods the burial of chariots and horses became much more widespread. Most Shang chariots were driven by two horses. Chariots pulled by four horses did not become widespread until the Spring and Autumn period. In some situations horses were buried in pits with chariots either side by side or one in front of the other. Some pits contained only horses and others only chariots. Sometimes the horses were buried in the main tomb while the chariots where in separate pits, while at times the reverse was the case (Lu 1993). A Shang period (11th century BC) horse and chariot pit M52 from Guojiazhuang, (Anyang, (Henan). The men and horses had been killed and lain in the pit before the chariot was lowered into it (Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Kaogu Yanjiusuo Anyangdui (CASS 1988; Bagley 1999). A Western Zhou period horse pit, Tianma-Qucun (Houma, Shanxi). The horses were apparently buried alive, with their feet tied together.

Unfortunately there are no lifelike statues of the Xia in China, just these jade and bronze works, {that have been made available anyway}. However, there are lots of them in the Americas, and that's exactly where we are going.

En son CANTAR tarafından Salı Ekim 05, 2010 6:15 pm tarihinde değiştirildi, toplamda 1 kere değiştirildi

Bende 1 Para Vardı.
Sendede 1 Para.
Paraları Değiştirdik.
Paramız Artmadı Senin 1 Paran,Benimde hala 1 Param Var.
Bende 1 Bilgi Vardı.
Sendede 1 Bilgi Bilgileri Değiştirdik.
Bak Şimdi Seninde 2 bilgin.
Benimde 2 bilgim oldu...



2 China-2 Bir Salı Ekim 05, 2010 6:13 pm




Ancient Homo-sapien-sapiens (Modern Man), first began to leave Africa at about 60,000 B.C. These Africans had two great migrations East. The "First" (OOA) migration, saw Blacks with straight hair, taking a route along the coast of Asia, and then "Island hopping" across the Indian Ocean to Australia - the Australian Aborigine (see below). And then making their way to South America - the remains called "Luzia" in Brazil.
The second (OOA) migration event, saw Blacks from Africa; some with straight hair and "Mongol features" (see; San people below), take an "Inland route" through southern Asia and on up to China (about 50-45,000 B.C.) where they settled. Included with this group, were straight haired Blacks "without" Mongol features - now called "Dravidians" who stayed close to Africa, and settled in India and other areas of southern Asia (see below).
Also included with this second (OOA) group, were Albinos (Blacks without pigmentation), who were probably motivated by a quest for relief from the heat and burning Sunshine of southern Africa - and relief from the torment heaped upon them by normal Africans. Even today, superstitious Blacks of southern Africa; maim and mutilate Albinos in the ignorant belief that their body parts process magical properties, which they use in rituals.

Australian Aborigine Dravidian Girl

The San People

(Genetically - the Oldest People in the World).

We realize that the concept of the White race originating from Albinos is difficult to comprehend; especially considering the amount of misinformation Whites have created in order to hide that fact. In order to help persons visualize that fact, please note the following graphics.
These are the "Original" People of India - The "Dravidians".

These are the "Albinos" of the "Original" People of India - The "Dravidians".



Of course, Dravidians are not the only Black People who can produce European type offspring. ANY Black couple with "Straightish" type hair and defective OCA2 genes, will produce offspring that is "Identical" to - and in fact is - a European type offspring.

Confirmation that the White (Caucasian) Race is derived from Dravidian Albinos, is documented in the findings from genetic analysis of Y-DNA haplogroup "R".

Haplogroup R (Y-DNA)
In human genetics, Haplogroup R is a Y-chromosome DNA haplogroup, a subgroup of haplogroup P, defined by the M207 mutation. This haplogroup is believed to have arisen around 26,800 years ago, somewhere in Central Asia or South Asia, where its ancestor Haplogroup P is most often found at polymorphic frequencies. Cambridge University geneticist Kivisild et al. (2003) suggests that southern and western Asia might be the source of this haplogroup: Given the geographic spread and STR diversities of sister clades R1 and R2, the latter of which is restricted to India, Pakistan, Iran, and southern central Asia, it is possible that southern and western Asia were the source for R1 and R1a differentiation. The R haplogroup is common throughout Europe and western Asia and the Indian sub-continent, and in those whose ancestry is from within these regions. It also occurs in North and Sub-Saharan Africa. The distribution is markedly different for the two major subclades R1a and R1b. Haplogroup R1a is typical in populations of Eastern Europe, Indian Subcontinent and parts of Central Asia. R1a has a significant presence in Northern Europe, Central Europe, Altaians and Iran as well as in Siberia. R1a can be found in low frequencies in the Middle East, mostly in Indo-European speakers or their descendants. Haplogroup R1b predominates in Western Europe. R1b can be found at high frequency in Bashkortostan (Russia). R1b can be found at low frequency in Central Asia, Middle East, South Asia as well as North Africa. There is an isolated pocket of R1b in Sub Saharan Africa. In Europe, R1b coincides with areas of Celtic influence.
The Albino pictures above, are taken from the study by Andreas Deffner titled: White, too white A Portrait of Albinism in India.

Link to the study

These Albinos continued on to Central Asia, where they settled, one of their tribes was the Zhou. It seems logical to assume that over the many thousands of years that it took for these migrants to reach northern Asia, that there would have been some interbreeding between the various Black tribes and the Albinos; which probably allowed the Albinos to gain some fixed degree of pigmentation. Proof of this admixture, is in the fact that Whites and Mongols (Chinese), both share the same founding Y-DNA haplogroup "K". Which seems to have evolved during their migration to northern Asia, but while they were still in Southern Asia. Haplogroup "K" is not found in Africa - of course the founding haplogroup of "K" is found in Africa. Further proof of White and Black Mongol admixture, is with the "Tarim mummies" which are a series of mummies (dating from 1,800 B.C.) discovered in the Tarim Basin in present-day Xinjiang, which is on the Chinese border with Central Asia, in northwest China. The oldest mummies are White people, but later, at about 1,100 B.C, they become "mixed-race".
Tarim Mummy

Click here for the History of Whites in Asia<>

Note: Use of the term "Albino" is not intended to demean or humiliate. Please Click here for an explanation of its use.

In Asia, one group similar to the Khoisan are represented by Y-DNA haplogroup "D" (In Africa, the "pure" Khoisan are known to be the worlds oldest humans - they are Y-DNA haplogroup "A"). Y-DNA haplogroup "D" is found at high frequency among populations in Japan, Tibet, and the Andaman Islands (in the Indian Ocean) - and at moderate frequency in Han Chinese ( the Han Chinese constitute 92 percent of China's population). This of course proves, that as would be expected, the "D" people, crossbred with everyone else. This group, now known as the Jomon, eventually migrated to Japan at about 35,000 B.C. They lived there undisturbed for thousands of years.

Haplogroup D (Y-DNA)

The Ainu people of Japan is notable for possessing almost exclusively Haplogroup D chromosomes In human genetics, Haplogroup D (M174) is a Y-chromosome haplogroup.D is believed to have originated in Africa some 50,000 years before present. Along with haplogroup E, D contains the distinctive YAP polymorphism, which indicates their common ancestry. Both D and E also contain the M168 change, which is present in all Y-chromosome haplogroups except A and B. Like haplogroup C, D is believed to represent a great coastal migration along southern Asia, from Arabia to Southeast Asia and thence northward to populate East Asia. It is found today at high frequency among populations in Tibet, the Japanese archipelago, and the Andaman Islands, though curiously not in India. The Ainu of Japan and the Jarawa and Onge of the Andaman Islands are notable for possessing almost exclusively Haplogroup D chromosomes, although Haplogroup C chromosomes also occur among the Ainu at a frequency of approximately 10%, similar to the Japanese. Haplogroup D chromosomes are also found at low to moderate frequencies among all the populations of Central and Northeast Asia as well as the Han and Miao-Yao peoples of China and among several minority populations of Yunnan that speak Tibeto-Burman languages and reside in close proximity to the Tibetans. Unlike haplogroup C, it did not travel from Asia to the New World. Geographic differentiation Haplogroup D is also remarkable for its rather extreme geographic differentiation, with a distinct subset of Haplogroup D chromosomes being found exclusively in each of the populations that contains a large percentage of individuals whose Y-chromosomes belong to Haplogroup D: Haplogroup D1 among the Tibetans (as well as among the mainland East Asian populations that display very low frequencies of Haplogroup D Y-chromosomes), Haplogroup D2 among the various populations of the Japanese Archipelago, Haplogroup D3 among the inhabitants of Tajikistan and other parts of mountainous southern Central Asia, and Haplogroup D* (probably another monophyletic branch of Haplogroup D) among the Andaman Islanders. Another type (or types) of Haplogroup D* is found at a very low frequency among the Turkic and Mongolic populations of Central Asia. This apparently ancient diversification of Haplogroup D suggests that it may perhaps be better characterized as a "super-haplogroup" or "macro-haplogroup." The Haplogroup D Y-chromosomes that are found among populations of the Japanese Archipelago are particularly distinctive, bearing a complex of at least five individual mutations along an internal branch of the Haplogroup D phylogeny, thus distinguishing them clearly from the Haplogroup D chromosomes that are found among the Tibetans and Andaman Islanders and providing evidence that Y-chromosome Haplogroup D2 was the modal haplogroup in the ancestral population that developed the prehistoric Jomon culture in the Japanese islands.

A pause to look across the Korea Strait, which connects China via the Korean peninsula to the southwestern Japanese islands of Kyūshū and Honshū. The Korea Strait is about 120 miles wide and averages about 300 ft. deep. It is dotted with many Islands, thus making Island hopping, relatively easy.
At about 35,000 B.C. a group of these African Chinese; later known to us as the Jomon, took this route and entered Japan, they became the first Humans to inhabit the Japanese Islands. Later, another group; Known to us as the Ainu, followed.
Although we do not have "Ancient life-like" depictions of the Jomon and Ainu, we do have pictures of members of their former migratory group - their genetic cousins, the Andaman Islanders of the Indian Ocean, (Just off the coast of Burma and Thailand). Oddly Indians were Not part of this group. Today, their genes can still be found in 40% of modern Japanese, as well as Mongolians and Tibetans. Genetic testing, specific to Xia, Shang and Olmec, as far as we know, has not yet been done.

Conquest of the Black Shang

Like the other peoples of the great Eurasian plains, the White Zhou were a nomadic tribe, they lived to the west of the Shang kingdom. Due to their nomadic ways, they learned how to work with people of different races and cultures. After a time, they settled in the Wei River valley, where they became vassals of the Shang. The Zhou eventually became stronger than the Shang, and in about 1040 B.C, they defeated the Shang in war. Part of their success apparently came about because of their ability to gain the allegiance of disaffected Shang city-states. The Shang had also been weakened by constant warfare with an unknown people to the north. After their victory, the Zhou built their capital in Xi'an.

Quote: "The Shang had also been weakened by constant warfare with an unknown people to the north".
From the quote above, the natural question to ask is; were those unknown people, the African Grimaldi, who we know inhabited the area north of what is now Mongolia, (mal'ta Siberia).
The answer is, we don't know. So far, material has not become available which would allow speculation, one way or the other. We must be mindful that the Chinese government does not disseminate information of this kind. And that they, like their European counterparts, are not anxious to acknowledge the part played by Africans in their development and history.

Traditional Chinese history says that the Zhou were able to defeat the Shang, because the Shang had degenerated morally. Part of this belief may have been propagandized by the Zhou themselves, they were proponents of the Mandate of Heaven. The Zhou used this idea to validate their takeover and subsequent ruling of the former Shang kingdom. The Mandate of Heaven says that Heaven places the mandate to rule, on any family, that is morally worthy of the responsibility. And the only way to know if the Mandate of Heaven has been removed from the ruling family, is if they are overthrown. So if the ruler is overthrown, then the victors had the Mandate of Heaven. In other words, if you win, then god must be on your side, and wanted it that way; perfect victors logic.

Ancient Chinese skin colors

The oldest life-like depictions of the "non-Shang" ancient Chinese that we have, is the Terracotta Army of the Qin Dynasty (221 - 206 B.C.), see below. The Terracotta Army is the Terra Cotta Warriors and Horses of Qin Shi Huang, the First Qin Dynasty Emperor. The terracotta figures, dating from 210 B.C, were discovered in 1974 by some local farmers near Xi'an, Shaanxi province China, near the Mausoleum of Qin Shi Huang, (Xi'an was also the home of the first Zhou kings).
From these statues - which originally were painted with natural skin tones, but which are now faded and peeling. We can clearly see the many skin colors and phenotypes of the ancient Chinese. Which is strange, because after so many thousands of years of Blacks and Whites co-existing in the same region, there should NOT have been such a clear distinction between Blacks and non-Blacks). Even though the Tarim mummy above, is clearly not an Albino, it does not show much admixture either. It is very unusual for humans to co-exist together in the same region, and not cross-breed to any appreciable degree for such a long period of time. This indicates that in the earliest years of Mans habitation in Central and East Asia, there were impediments to Blacks and Albinos intermingling. The catalyst for ending this separation was obviously the defeat of the Black Shang by the White Zhou.
Qin Dynasty Terracotta Soldiers

Click here for more pictures of the Terracotta Soldiers <<>>

The fact that there WAS some impediment to cross-breeding prior to the Zhou's defeat of the Shang in 1040 B.C, is demonstrated by the evidence of rapid crossbreeding since that defeat. After the first perhaps 45,000 years of regional coexistence, there was still a clear distinction between Black and non-Black Chinese. But in the just 3,000 years since the Zhou victory in 1040 B.C, the Chinese have become an almost "Homogenous" people, with relatively little difference in skin color. (Not withstanding the fact that as late as the 13th century A.D, there were still many "Pure Black" Mongol tribes in existence - see Huns and Silk Scrolls below).


This same fate of the Shang, awaits the Ancients in Japan. There they are called the Jomon and the Ainu. But they will last a bit longer, it's not until about 350 B.C. that a Mongol group called the "Yayoi" will break-off from China and invade, conquer and destroy their civilization. These Yayoi are the progenitors of modern Japanese.
Although the Ainu had been in Japan since at least 13,000 B.C. - the Jomon even longer - 35,000 B.C. there is still not enough archaeological material "available" to do a history on them, otherwise they would have been included here.
However, that material which is available, is presented in the "Additional Material Area" of this site. Go to the Additional material Menu, for a short history and some truly beautiful artifacts of the Jomon. And the "Prehistoric America" link (on the same menu), for more on the Ainu. Click Blue Banner Below.
It is said that "Sakanouye Tamuramaro" the first Shogun of Japan (A black man), was given that title for his campaigns against the Ainu in northern Japan, (about 797 A.D.). Which suggests that descendents of the Jomon, still existed in Japan in the current era (A.D.). We are of course assuming that if he is warring against the Ainu, and he is a Black man - then he must be Jomon. But he could also be from China or even Southeast Asia. If he was from S.E.A. then likely he would have been a Champa of Viet Nam. That original ancient civilization is presented later.
The logic here is because of occupation patterns - The Ainu inhabited the northern Islands, the Jomon the southern Islands. The Yayoi first invaded and occupied the southern Islands. Because of their isolation and perhaps military might, the Ainu were able to hold out. Logically then, if Sakanouye is with the Yayoi, then he is likely Jomon, maybe. In any event, descendents of the Ainu still exist, even today. However, they have been for the most part, ethnically absorbed.

A religious note: In the Vajrayana Buddhism of China, the Five Wisdom Kings, also known as the Five Guardian Kings, are a group of Wisdom Kings who represent the luminescent wisdom of the Buddha and protect the Five Wisdom Buddha’s. In Japanese Buddhism however, the Wisdom Kings, Buddha’s and bodhisattvas merge into the group of thirteen Buddha’s. In modern times, the appearance of the Fudo Myoo has changed.

Back to China and the Zhou: Who have by now, adopted much of the Shang lifestyle. Often importing Shang families, or even entire communities, to new towns that they had built in order to utilize the knowledge and skills of Shang technologist and artisans. The bronze vessels of the Zhou are nearly identical to those of the Shang. The Zhou also adopted much of the Shang writing system as well as their rituals and administrative techniques. The Zhou however, began a different form of government, they preferred a system which was basically feudal. In their system land was given to people in elaborate ceremonies, and the new landowners would then become vassals of the king. Descent became patriarchal, from father to son, rather than from eldest brother to youngest brother as practiced by the Shang.
The Zhou, despite transporting the Shang to their new cities in order to utilize their skills, did not want to live directly with the Shang. Their capital was divided into two sections, one for the Zhou, which contained the imperial court, and the other half for the transported Shang. Other Zhou cities also exhibited this same pattern.
The Zhou also brought religious change with them, they banned the Shang practice of human sacrifice. The Zhou practiced the cult of Heaven, which was the worship of the sun and stars. Some of the more popular Shang gods however, became incorporated into this system. These were lesser gods, and served as feudal lords to the Heaven-god of the Zhou.

Though it is not possible to exactly trace the racial machinations of ancient China. Some inferences can be drawn from the times of the Hun Empire, and the great Mongol Empire of Genghis Khan.

The Huns

The Huns were a nomadic pastoral people from Eastern Asia, they invaded Europe in about 370 A.D. and created an enormous empire; which reached as far west as Germany. They were possibly the descendants of the Xiongnu who had been northern neighbors of China three hundred years before.The Huns may have stimulated the Great Migration, a contributing factor in the collapse of the Roman Empire. They formed a unified empire under Attila the Hun, who died in 453 A.D; their empire broke up the next year.
Jordanes - The Roman historian, wrote a book on the history of the Goths called "Getica" (circa 551 A.D). In his book, he describes the Huns as: They made their foes flee in horror because their swarthy (black skinned) aspect was fearful, and they had, if I may call it so, a sort of hideous lump, not a head, with pinholes rather than eyes. For they cut the cheeks of the males with a sword, so that before they receive the nourishment of milk they must learn to endure wounds. Hence they grow old beardless and their young men are without comeliness, because a face furrowed by the sword spoils by its scars the mature beauty of a beard. It is also said that another common custom of the Huns was to strap their children's noses flat from an early age, in order to widen their faces, as to increase the terror their looks instilled upon their enemies.

The Mongols

Genghis Khan came to power by uniting many of the nomadic tribes of northeast Asia. After founding the Mongol Empire and being proclaimed "Genghis Khan", he started the Mongol invasions and raids of the Kara-Khitan Khanate, Caucasus, Khwarezmid Empire, Western Xia and Jin dynasties, and Europe, as far west as Poland and Hungary.

Kublai Khan was the fifth Great Khan of the Mongol Empire from 1260 to 1294 and the founder of the Yuan Dynasty. As the second son of Tolui and Sorghaghtani Beki and a grandson of Genghis Khan. By the time of Kublai Khan, the racial make-up of modern China is well on the way. From the partial scroll on the right above; we can see that Kublai Khan's wife is very pale. And from the full view of the scroll on the left above; we can see that of the eight representatives of the various tribes, only two are pure Black men. {The Scroll painting is located at the National Palace Museum, Taipei}.

So ends the Rule of the Ancients in China. However as we have already seen, remnants of the Xia have long ago, crossed the Bering straits and entered the Americas. There they are known as the Olmec, but they still call themselves the Xia. Unfortunately in the Americans, they still adhere to their old ways of human sacrifice. Worst yet, their neighbors the Amerindians, embrace it and practice it with a vengeance. This to the detriment of all, for the local hatreds engendered by this practice, will set the stage for the annihilation of the Amerindian at the hands of the Europeans. But that will have to wait, for now let's go back to Elam.

Whites and Mongols are NOT Races!

The corollary to the above proofs and exhibits, is that the White mans division of the worlds people into the three Human races (Black, White and Mongol) is false and self-serving. When a group member of a species with a great variety of physical attributes - such as Black Humans - who exhibit ALL Human attributes: Black skin, White skin (Albinos), Broad noses, Narrow noses, Full lips, Thin lips, Wooly hair, Straight hair, Hair of all colors, Hair of all textures, Very tall people, Very short people, People with Mongol features - breaks away, and forms a "Supergroup" of ONLY those with a "Single" particular distinct attribute, and through some type of isolation - forced or otherwise, breed exclusively among themselves, thus producing offspring with only that one attribute. They create a Sub-species containing ONLY that attribute! So when isolate members of a species ALL share a common trait, such as (White Skin - Albinism). They do not form a "New" Race, they form a SUB-SPECIES. Thus Whites are NOT a RACE, they are a SUB-SPECIES! So when isolate members of a species ALL share a common trait, such as (Mongol features). They form a SUB-SPECIES. Thus Mongol is NOT a RACE, it is a SUB-SPECIES! So when isolate members of a species ALL share a common trait, such as (extreme small stature - Pygmy) . They form a SUB-SPECIES. Thus the Pygmy is NOT a RACE, it is a SUB-SPECIES! Therefore, there is only ONE RACE - the "All Encompassing" Black skinned Human race: all others are Sub-species.

Bende 1 Para Vardı.
Sendede 1 Para.
Paraları Değiştirdik.
Paramız Artmadı Senin 1 Paran,Benimde hala 1 Param Var.
Bende 1 Bilgi Vardı.
Sendede 1 Bilgi Bilgileri Değiştirdik.
Bak Şimdi Seninde 2 bilgin.
Benimde 2 bilgim oldu...



Önceki başlık Sonraki başlık Sayfa başına dön  Mesaj [1 sayfadaki 1 sayfası]

Bu forumun müsaadesi var:
Bu forumdaki mesajlara cevap veremezsiniz